Posted: March 28th, 2011 by HrAstro
Finally I had time to open a new subcategory on my web page, subcategory dedicated to a little tools of mine. The first tool is to help to quick find a appropriate imaging object for the night, Astrophotography object suggestion tool. If you like it, please spread a word :).
Posted: February 4th, 2007 by HrAstro
Astrophotography poses challenges that are distinct from normal photography because most subjects are usually quite faint, and are often small in angular size!
I decided to take this challenge and make this site in order to present you my work in this discipline that popularises astronomy so much! (more about me)
And now I'm going to stop yapping and show you what I got. Enjoy!
Latest three photos:
galleries, deepsky moon planets widefield
back to top
Posted: February 4th, 2007 by HrAstro
You're a proud owner of a telescope, and for some strange reason you also have a camera. So, have you ever wondered whether is it possible to photograph anything? Believe it or not, the answer is yes. For such a purpose any digital camera will do. The only question that remains, is which method should be used. If you own an automatic camera, you'll be limited only to lighter objects like the Moon, or the planets, and the only method which is at your disposal is the Afocal method. If you own a professional SLR digital camera almost all the doors are opened. The only problem may represent the rest of the equipment.
Posted by HrAstro
Rob Miller: I liked your site.
Geoff Scott: In case noone else has mentioedn it, hardness has a second S. Also a description somewhere of what the 1-6? hardness scale means would be useful.
Miroslav: Vrlo lijepa i poučna stranica. Svaka čast! Super dizajn. :)
Marko: Pozdrav. Zamolio bih Vas za jedan savjet. Želio bih kupiti teleskop: proizvođača Celestron, bez motora. Želio bih taj teleskop koristiti za promatranje Mjeseca, planeta (Venere,Marsa...), galaksija i maglica. Bitno mi je ne samo da se vide svi planeti i galaksije, nego da se i dobro vide mnogi detalji (i na planetima i u galaksijama). Zanima me ako imate iskustva sa tim da mi preporučite koje karakteristike taj teleskop mora imati (promjer i duljinu optičke cijevi). Koji je najidealniji odnos promjera i duljine optičke cijevi za ta promatranja? Za promatranje galaksija i maglica bolji su reflektori od refraktora, a za promatranja planeta bolji su refraktori, zar ne (pod pojmom \"bolji\" podrazumijevam da su reflektori pristupačniji cijenom, ali i da se sa njima galaksije vide bolje i sa više detalja budući da se za cijenu refraktora mogu dobiti reflektori koji su dosta većeg promjera)? I još jedno pitanje ako imate iskustva sa tim: da li je teleskop (reflektor) karakteristika 250/1200 mm idealan za promatranje galaksija (ali i detalja unutar tih galaksija) ili je za to potreban veći teleskop (većeg promjera odnosno dužine)? Unaprijed se zahvaljujem na informacijama.
Debayan: HI CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME THAT DID BUY AN OTA OF C10-N? DEBAYAN CLEAR SKIES
MIlan Gucić: Pozdrav Matija, fotke su ti sjajne, narocito poslednje Elephant trunk i M20 i M8. Svetski kvalitet. Veil maglina me je odusevila.Svaka cast i samo napred! pozdrav iz Beograda! Milan
George: Good job, it inspires me to do astrophotography by myself
Ivor: Raduju me ovakve slike, jer se nadam da ce i moja mashina C8 ovakve slike praviti. Puno pozdrava
